← Search

Brenda Green

Benton, AR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 51W–39L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Brenda Green to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
W
2026-08-27 · Allison/Taylor/Benton/OC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carrie Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-3
W
2026-07-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jonathan Halford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-28 · Allison/Taylor/Benton/OC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Warford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-27 · Allison/Junior/Benton/OC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Moreland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4
L
2026-07-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brice Sisco mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-22 · Allison/Junior/Benton/OC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Moreland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-07-20 · Allison/Taylor/Benton/OC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Buck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · Allison/Taylor/Benton/OC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Buck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-09 · Allison/Taylor/Benton/OC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Rutledge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamie Robinson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Brooks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-2
L
2026-06-22 · Allison/Taylor/Benton/OC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Buck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.3% of games
3.0
62.8%
27W–16L · 56.8% of games
3.5
21.4%
3W–11L · 39% of games
5.5
84.6%
11W–2L · 63.6% of games
6.5
20%
1W–4L · 36.7% of games
3.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 53.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
20 matches
#1 Singles
7%
6 matches
#2 Singles
7%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert