← Search

Curtis Ottens

Mentor, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
69 matches · 29W–40L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Curtis Ottens to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history69 matches
W
2026-07-01 · A55 8.0M MV Gustafson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Timothy Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-17 · A55 8.0M MV Gustafson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Dray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-27 · A55 8.0M MV Gustafson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Norm Loescher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-07-10 · A55 8.0M MV Gustafson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ken Gustafson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
Kent Smith / Michael Rife
2025-05-29 · A55 8.0M MV Gustafson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Douglas Vahey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2024-07-28 · X18 8.0 MV2 Haught · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Erica Wigton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2024-07-15 · A55 8.0M MV Gustafson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Timothy Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-06-30 · X18 8.0 MV2 Haught · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marisa Fiucci Rosen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-06-24 · A55 8.0M MV Gustafson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Palermo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2024-06-23 · X18 8.0 MV2 Haught · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Erica Wigton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
Paul Nahra / William Davis
2024-05-20 · A55 8.0M MV Gustafson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Preet Kang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
2024-05-13 · A55 8.0M MV Gustafson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frank Mercuri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
38.5%
5W–8L · 50% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 59.3% of games
7.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 48.2% of games
8.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
29.6%
8W–19L · 42% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
15 matches
#2 Singles
9%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams