← Search

Willard Greenwood

— year-end
93 matches · 52W–41L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Willard Greenwood to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history93 matches
W
Ajay Bhardwaj
2026-07-07 · A40 4.0M LT Keresztes · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-01 · A55 8.0M WR Manak · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Philip Dubsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-30 · A40 4.0M LT Keresztes · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
Michael Levy / Andreas Spintzyk
2026-06-24 · A55 8.0M WR Manak · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Philip Dubsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-23 · A40 4.0M LT Keresztes · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Rose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-18 · A18 4.0M 2 LT2 Simon · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-16 · A40 4.0M LT Keresztes · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Bolinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-10 · A55 8.0M WR Manak · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Rehtorik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · A40 4.0M LT Keresztes · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Anthony Wnoroski
2026-05-28 · A18 4.0M 2 LT2 Simon · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-05-27 · A55 8.0M WR Manak · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph Moran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-26 · A40 4.0M LT Keresztes · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lion Moeliono
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
70.7%
41W–17L · 58.7% of games
4.5
33.3%
6W–12L · 41.8% of games
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 47.4% of games
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 45% of the time
#1 Singles
45%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
11 matches
#2 Singles
9%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer