← Search

Hannah Jablonski

Tucson, AZ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
156 matches · 71W–85L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Hannah Jablonski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history156 matches
W
2026-05-16 · WHATHappened? · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cristina Ramos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-03-31 · WHATHappened? · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Valerie Kilpatrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-03-20 · What happened? · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Goldberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-13 · What happened? · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jackeline Cuadras
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-02-22 · What happened? · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jackeline Cuadras
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-02-20 · What happened? · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Selma Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
Karen Rice / Tonya Tuggle
2025-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Linda Albert championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
Louisa Wolowiecki / Susie Timm
2025-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Linda Albert championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-05-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Birgit Allmann-Treusch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-03-22 · Credit · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cristina Ramos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 62% of games
4.0
57.5%
46W–34L · 51.2% of games
4.5
23.1%
9W–30L · 35.3% of games
8.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 63.4% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 46.2% of games
8.0mixed
35.3%
6W–11L · 40.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
57 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
47 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams