← Search

Annette Volle

Tucson, AZ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 53W–58L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Annette Volle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history111 matches
W
Lisa Brady / Chelsea Fuller
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Caryn Barman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-05-22 · Net Threats · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbi Holden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · Net Threats · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Minette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · Aced · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Strohm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-08 · Net Threats · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Perrelle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-18 · Net Threats · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caryn Barman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-17 · Net Threats · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbi Holden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · with Shannon Bohan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-31 · Aced · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sharon Steehler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-11 · 40 & Fierce Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brenda Blend
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-28 · 40 & Fierce Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brenda Blend
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-02-07 · Aces after Forty · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carman Ryken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
66%
35W–18L · 52.5% of games
4.0
7.9%
3W–35L · 31.3% of games
7.0
76.5%
13W–4L · 56.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 64% of the time
#1 Doubles
64%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe