← Search

Kayla Amaral

— year-end
16 matches · 11W–5L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Kayla Amaral to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history16 matches
W
2026-06-30 · Seivers/Gilliam/Nasville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Leslie Gilliam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
Lindsay Brown
2025-11-24 · Covington/Nashville · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-11-16 · Covington/Nashville · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2025-10-20 · Covington/Nashville · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-10-13 · Covington/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Segura
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-09-20 · Blevins/Thomas/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Gretchen Olson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-08-16 · Blevins/Thomas/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michelle Reyzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
2025-07-26 · Blevins/Thomas/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Stacy Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2024-07-16 · Amaral/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Natasha Beloglazova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-02 · Amaral/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Natasha Beloglazova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2024-06-25 · Amaral/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Natasha Beloglazova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2024-06-18 · Amaral/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Natasha Beloglazova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Teams5 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
100%
4W–0L · 69.1% of games
4.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 52.6% of games
8.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
9 matches
#2 Singles
25%
4 matches
#1 Singles
6%
1 match
#2 Doubles
6%
1 match
#3 Doubles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe