← Search

Julie Segura

— year-end
50 matches · 23W–27L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Julie Segura to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
L
2026-08-05 · Williams/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Rachel Lovingood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-02 · Williams/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Stacie McIntosh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-26 · McLaughlin/Laney/Murfreesboro · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Jones mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-27 · McLaughlin/Laney/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bill BALDI mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-06-23 · McLaughlin/Laney/Murfreesboro · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Jones mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-17 · Chant/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hollie Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-09 · Chant/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Siprachanh Chanthaphaychith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-02 · Spalding/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Noelle Cotey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · McDonald/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Gedney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-04-18 · Spalding/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Siprachanh Chanthaphaychith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-06 · McDonald/Nashville · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristina Rogers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-03-28 · Spalding/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Elliott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
51.4%
18W–17L · 50.7% of games
4.5
0%
0W–5L · 36% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer