← Search

Karen Yocum

— year-end
163 matches · 100W–63L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Karen Yocum to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history163 matches
L
2026-09-11 · Park City Boom · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Couderc
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-04 · Park City Boom · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sue Ann Kern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-20 · Park City Boom · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Couderc
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-14 · Park City Boom · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Couderc
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2025-10-11 · #2 Doubles · with Sherree Greenhalgh championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-10-11 · #2 Doubles · with Sherree Greenhalgh championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-10 · #2 Doubles · with Rebecca Rush championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-09-19 · Utah/Tomczyk/65&Over7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sherree Greenhalgh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2025-09-05 · Utah/Tomczyk/65&Over7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Bedell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-08-25 · Utah/Tomczyk/65&Over7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sherree Greenhalgh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-08-15 · Utah/Tomczyk/65&Over7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rebecca Rush
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-07-07 · Park City MARC-Tomczyk · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alice Moe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
Teams33 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
56%
14W–11L · 55.5% of games
3.5
49%
25W–26L · 49.9% of games
6.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 61.7% of games
7.0
69.6%
39W–17L · 60.9% of games
6.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 29% of the time
#3 Doubles
29%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
33 matches
#1 Singles
12%
19 matches
#2 Singles
7%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King