← Search

Greg Ervin

Cedar Rapids, IA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
35 matches · 13W–22L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Greg Ervin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history35 matches
L
2026-05-02 · Garner & Murphy: Elmcrest · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Damisch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-28 · Garner & Murphy: Elmcrest · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tim Carstensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-07 · Randall: Elmcrest · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Drew Pierson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-02-01 · Brown · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Holly Ervin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-25 · Brown · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Holly Ervin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-12-20 · Garner: Smithfield · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Garner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-22 · Randall & Ross: Elmcrest · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Sundermann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-09 · Brown · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Holly Ervin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-11-08 · Randall & Ross: Elmcrest · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Sundermann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-11-01 · Garner: Smithfield · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-18 · Garner: Smithfield · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tim Carstensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-27 · Randall & Ross: Elmcrest · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
39.1%
9W–14L · 44.4% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 22.1% of games
7.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
7 matches
#1 Singles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal