← Search

Jeffrey Garner

Cedar Rapids, IA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
30 matches · 2W–28L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jeffrey Garner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
L
2026-03-06 · Garner · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amara Andrews mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-22 · Carstensen/Nichols · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daryl Patten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-21 · Randall: Elmcrest · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tom Randall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
Ann Brown / Robert Tyler
2026-02-08 · Garner · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Novak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-30 · Garner · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amara Andrews mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-25 · Garner · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Novak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-01-03 · Garner: Smithfield · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Odegaard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-12-20 · Garner: Smithfield · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Greg Ervin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-12-06 · Garner: Smithfield · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Errington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-23 · Garner · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Golding mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-11-22 · Randall & Ross: Elmcrest · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Drew Pierson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-07 · Garner · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rochelle Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
0%
0W–8L · 19.3% of games
4.0
11.1%
1W–8L · 24.8% of games
7.0
0%
0W–5L · 41.6% of games
7.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 28.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
9 matches
#1 Singles
13%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert