← Search

Zoe Robertson

— year-end
89 matches · 39W–50L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add Zoe Robertson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history89 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Armonk Tennis Club Smart Aces 18+ 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Hammes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
Michelle Strong / Stella Yi-Burke
2026-07-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Berman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
Tori Bender / Isabel Murphy
2026-05-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Berman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-03 · W/R: CRRC: Mixed Smashers · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Craig Robertson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
W
Amy Morris / Natalie Gorlin
2026-04-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Berman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-12 · W/R: CRRC: Mixed Smashers · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Craig Robertson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-03-17 · Armonk Tennis Club Smart Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Schulman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-11 · Armonk Tennis Club Smart Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Schulman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-03 · Armonk Tennis Club Smart Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Hammes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-02-26 · Armonk Tennis Club Smart Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Hammes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-24 · Armonk Tennis Club Smart Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brooke Jaeger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-02-03 · Armonk Tennis Club Smart Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brooke Jaeger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
Teams19 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
43%
37W–49L · 47.4% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
23 matches
#2 Singles
5%
4 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams