← Search

Lori Keller

— year-end
120 matches · 58W–62L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lori Keller to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history120 matches
L
2026-08-23 · STC-Robinson · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rita Lashchuk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
Nicole Taylor / Katie Humphreville
2026-08-16 · STC-Robinson · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patricia Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-19 · STC-Robinson · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Arnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-28 · STC-Robinson · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Arnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-11 · STC-Robinson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annette Ross-Gray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-04 · STC-Robinson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Conrad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-01 · STC-Robinson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suzanne Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-4
W
2026-03-23 · STC-Robinson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Wehrkamp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-03-16 · STC-Robinson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-03-13 · STC-Robinson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Naomi Cline
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
Sam Linhardt / Emily Turner
2026-03-09 · STC-Robinson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-5
W
2026-03-08 · STC-Robinson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Teams26 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
55.6%
15W–12L · 51.7% of games
3.5
49.3%
34W–35L · 46.6% of games
6.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 46.9% of games
7.0
37.5%
6W–10L · 44.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
19 matches
#2 Singles
14%
17 matches
#1 Singles
13%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert