← Search

Jim Texter

Clarence, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
152 matches · 87W–65L · seasons 2016–2026

Captains: add Jim Texter to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history152 matches
W
2026-08-08 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Timothy Monte championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Carl DiNatale championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-07 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-04 · Hutch Tech · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paul Hutschenreuter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · Hutch Tech · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paul Hutschenreuter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-08 · Buffalo Wild · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-25 · Eastern/Sage/40&Over4.0M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nathaniel Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-24 · Buffalo Wild · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-15 · Buffalo Wild · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-01 · Buffalo Wild · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-21 · Eastern/Sage/40&Over4.0M · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
88%
22W–3L · 65.7% of games
4.5
29.4%
5W–12L · 40.2% of games
8.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
72.4%
21W–8L · 64.9% of games
9.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 45.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
38 matches
#1 Singles
20%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
23 matches
#2 Singles
6%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer