← Search

Paul Hutschenreuter

Alden, NY
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
193 matches · 128W–65L · seasons 2016–2026

Captains: add Paul Hutschenreuter to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history193 matches
W
2026-08-04 · Hutch Tech · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jim Texter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-07-28 · Hutch Tech · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Timothy Prise
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-21 · Hutch Tech · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ronald White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · Hutch Tech · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jim Texter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-25 · Buffalo One · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Saby George
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · Buffalo One · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Saumil Deora
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-17 · Banks · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cynthia Albrecht mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-21 · Banks · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cynthia Albrecht mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-15 · Banks · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cynthia Albrecht mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2024-08-24 · #3 Doubles · with Linda Nappo championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2024-08-11 · #2 Doubles · with Jim Texter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-08-10 · #1 Doubles · with Jim Texter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
100%
7W–0L · 66.2% of games
4.0
63.3%
19W–11L · 57.4% of games
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 53.6% of games
7.0mixed
80%
32W–8L · 58.3% of games
8.0mixed
85.1%
40W–7L · 60.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
86 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
45 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe