← Search

Nicholas Geer

— year-end
267 matches · 145W–122L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nicholas Geer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history267 matches
L
2026-08-17 · Liberty Park-Wright/Harnicher · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jordan Christensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-08-14 · Liberty Park-Saltzman · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Natalie Romaniw mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-07 · Liberty Park-Saltzman · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Meghan Kellner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-06 · Wasatch Faults · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-23 · Wasatch Faults · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timothy Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-10 · Liberty Park-Saltzman · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jamie DeLong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
Aleksandr Eyre / Logan Pickle
2026-07-09 · Liberty Park-Wright/Harnicher · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nathan Hillier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-18 · Wasatch Faults · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
Brady Rasmussen / Stephen Thompson
2026-06-11 · #2 Doubles · with Manti Hansen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-21 · Liberty Park-Wright · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-14 · Liberty Park-Wright · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-08 · Liberty Park-Wright · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kasen Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
Teams64 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 50% of games
3.5
77.4%
41W–12L · 58.7% of games
4.0
54.3%
63W–53L · 51.1% of games
4.5
5.9%
1W–16L · 35% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 56.2% of games
7.5mixed
46.2%
12W–14L · 47.6% of games
8.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 54.3% of games
8.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
118 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
90 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
47 matches
#1 Male Doubles
2%
6 matches
#3 Male Doubles
1%
3 matches
#2 Male Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer