← Search

Kimberly Means

— year-end
37 matches · 10W–27L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Kimberly Means to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history37 matches
L
2026-08-13 · SCC Court Wreckers Nobles · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alex Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-12 · SCC Court Wreckers Nobles · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally Hurt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-26 · Sal’s Berries - Jamison · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Sorensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-25 · Sal’s Berries - Jamison · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaime Wisegarver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-10 · 14 SCC Nickel/Diel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Gilbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-08 · 14 SCC Nickel/Diel · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Nobles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-5
L
2026-07-01 · 14 SCC Nickel/Diel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Schuster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-17 · 14 SCC Nickel/Diel · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-13 · Sal’s Berries - Jamison · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Joyce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-05-02 · SCC Foley · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Fondren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-04-25 · SCC Foley · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Schuster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-18 · SCC Foley · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Fondren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Teams34 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0
38.5%
5W–8L · 49.8% of games
3.5
9.1%
1W–10L · 40.4% of games
5.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 54.1% of games
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
7 matches
#1 Singles
16%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
3 matches
#2 Female Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert