← Search

Julie Nobles

— year-end
41 matches · 15W–26L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Julie Nobles to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
L
2026-09-12 · SCC Strings of Glory - Weisiger · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lauren Schuster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-11 · SCC Coon · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Knick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-02 · SCC Court Wreckers Nobles · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Becky McNeer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-26 · SCC Court Wreckers Nobles · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally Hurt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-25 · SCC Coon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Garrett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-19 · SCC Court Wreckers Nobles · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Becky McNeer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-13 · SCC Court Wreckers Nobles · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Becky McNeer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-12 · SCC Court Wreckers Nobles · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Diel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-09 · SCC Strings of Glory - Weisiger · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with BRANDY NICKEL
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-07 · SCC Coon · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Krumpe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-08-04 · SCC Coon · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colleen Weisiger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-30 · SCC Court Wreckers Nobles · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Becky McNeer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
Teams42 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
41.9%
13W–18L · 45.1% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 22.6% of games
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 53.7% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe