← Search

Jennifer Rutledge

Henrico, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
18 matches · 4W–14L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Rutledge to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history18 matches
L
2026-09-05 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lisa Rodgers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-30 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jamie Borel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-22 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jamie Borel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-16 · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Angela Prado
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jenna Coyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-30 · Chestnut Oaks Nelson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Condyles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-05-09 · Chestnut Oaks Nelson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Condyles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-02 · Chestnut Oaks Nelson · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Wong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-20 · Chestnut Oaks 6.0 - Coyle · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beth Condyles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-18 · Chestnut Oaks Nelson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cara Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-13 · Chestnut Oaks 6.0 - Coyle · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jenna Coyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-06 · Chestnut Oaks 6.0 - Coyle · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beth Condyles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 33.3% of games
5.5
40%
2W–3L · 45.2% of games
6.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
4 matches
#2 Singles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King