← Search

Karen Rothenberg

— year-end
143 matches · 89W–54L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Karen Rothenberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history143 matches
W
2026-08-01 · #4 Doubles · with Eve Kecskes championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-07-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Gordon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
Kristen Laitin / Joan Veteska
2026-07-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Sweeney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Hammes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eve Kecskes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
Emily Sobol / Dorathy Sunshine
2026-06-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Hammes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
Kate Mitchell / Jennifer Shim
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Hammes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-21 · CRRC Servive the Day 18+ 3.5 Day · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Agdern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Hammes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-30 · CRRC Servive the Day 18+ 3.5 Day · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shari Matusow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-03-26 · Chestnut Ridge · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-06 · Chestnut Ridge · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Allatt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Teams24 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
81.2%
13W–3L · 68.4% of games
3.5
61.1%
66W–42L · 53% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
40 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova