← Search

Katie Sweeney

Bedford, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
126 matches · 83W–43L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Katie Sweeney to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history126 matches
W
2026-09-11 · Chestnut Ridge: Servive the Day (Fall) - 18+ 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Olivia Reighley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
Kris Adams / Nancy DAmato
2026-08-16 · #4 Doubles · with Jennifer Rackoff championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · #4 Doubles · with Julia Kelly championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-14 · #4 Doubles · with Jennifer Rackoff championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
Annette Welles / Ling Zhang
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Jennifer Rackoff championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
Kristen Laitin / Joan Veteska
2026-07-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Rothenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Schultz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-18 · CRRC Servive the Day 18+ 3.5 Day · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Rose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diana Mann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-11 · CRRC Servive the Day 18+ 3.5 Day · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Milano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
Marla Hoffman / Dorothy Brill
2026-06-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Rackoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-28 · CRRC Servive the Day 18+ 3.5 Day · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eve Kecskes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
100%
7W–0L · 85.7% of games
3.0
88%
22W–3L · 62.2% of games
3.5
52.7%
29W–26L · 52.3% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
30 matches
#1 Singles
8%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer