← Search

Cathy Hammes

Chappaqua, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
138 matches · 46W–92L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Cathy Hammes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history138 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Armonk Tennis Club Smart Aces 18+ 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zoe Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Rothenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
Emily Sobol / Dorathy Sunshine
2026-06-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Rothenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
Kate Mitchell / Jennifer Shim
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Rothenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Milano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Rothenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-17 · Armonk Tennis Club Smart Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Jung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-11 · Armonk Tennis Club Smart Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Fran Torres
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-03 · Armonk Tennis Club Smart Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zoe Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-02-26 · Armonk Tennis Club Smart Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zoe Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-22 · Armonk Tennis Club Smart Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Jung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-01-13 · Armonk Tennis Club Smart Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zoe Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 57.7% of games
3.5
32.1%
42W–89L · 43.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
42%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert