← Search

Catherine Hall

Kihei, HI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
316 matches · 144W–172L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Catherine Hall to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history316 matches
W
2026-07-01 · Group Therapy · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Cannon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-20 · Group Therapy · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeanne Dunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-06 · Group Therapy · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deanna DiBiase
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-25 · #4 Doubles · with Rebecca Jakeway championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-8
L
Cynthia Funai / Debbie Montgomery
2026-05-24 · #1 Doubles · with Brooke von Tempsky championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-8
L
2026-05-24 · #3 Doubles · with Kimber Hoang-Street championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-8
L
2026-05-23 · #3 Doubles · with Brooke von Tempsky championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-8
L
2026-05-10 · MCC Team Spirit · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Judge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-26 · MCC Team Spirit · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kimber Hoang-Street
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-04-15 · Court Junkies · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Chan Ly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-04 · Court Junkies · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Chan Ly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-04 · Court Junkies · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Chan Ly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams71 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
63.3%
31W–18L · 52.1% of games
4.0
32%
24W–51L · 42.5% of games
7.0
87.1%
27W–4L · 62.8% of games
8.0
37.9%
11W–18L · 46.2% of games
9.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
55%
22W–18L · 54.1% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
13W–26L · 41.8% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 33.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
90 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
88 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
62 matches
#1 Female Doubles
8%
26 matches
#1 Singles
7%
22 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
5%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer