← Search

Crystal Graves

Lahaina, HI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
110 matches · 67W–43L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Crystal Graves to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history110 matches
W
2026-06-20 · Hawaiian Punch · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Petra Dupont
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-13 · Hawaiian Punch · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracy Halbersleben
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-06 · Hawaiian Punch · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Petra Dupont
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-30 · Hawaiian Punch · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Petra Dupont
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-0
W
2026-05-28 · Hawaiian Punch · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mona Decrinis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-12 · Wailea Tsunami · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nolan Wren mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-11 · Wailea Tsunami · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brad Helman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-03-15 · Wailea Tsunami · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brad Helman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-7
L
2026-03-07 · Wailea Tsunami · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Hanson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-01 · Wailea Tsunami · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Hanson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
Danielle Smith / Elizabeth Lund
2025-10-11 · #2 Doubles · with Emily Collins championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2025-10-10 · #1 Doubles · with Emily Collins championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
92.3%
24W–2L · 71.7% of games
4.0
56%
14W–11L · 53.3% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 57% of games
8.0
25%
2W–6L · 39.9% of games
7.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 53.2% of games
8.0mixed
40.9%
9W–13L · 47.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
22 matches
#1 Singles
19%
21 matches
#2 Singles
13%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
7 matches
#1 Female Doubles
6%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer