← Search

Shelby Ruehling

— year-end
46 matches · 27W–19L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Shelby Ruehling to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Andrews/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Jagar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-09-04 · Liles/Lee/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Greathouse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-26 · Andrews/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lauren Tuck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-21 · Liles/Lee/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joni Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
Ginger Childs / Denise Lee
2026-07-31 · Liles/Lee/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lauren Tuck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
Gretchen Dahle / Laura Wilson
2026-04-29 · Broome/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tory Fitzgibbon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-04-22 · Broome/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Broome
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-04-08 · Broome/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Broome
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-01 · Broome/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tory Fitzgibbon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-30 · Broome/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tory Fitzgibbon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-03-25 · Broome/Nashville · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-03-24 · Broome/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Broome
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Teams25 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
58.8%
20W–14L · 52.7% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
70%
7W–3L · 60.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
10 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe