← Search

Lisa Jagar

— year-end
28 matches · 21W–7L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Lisa Jagar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history28 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Andrews/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shelby Ruehling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-19 · Andrews/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lauren Tuck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-14 · Liles/Lee/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Broome
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-15 · Burke/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Hipp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-24 · Burke/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maggie Stockton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-10 · Burke/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Robbins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-03 · Burke/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nikki Turitto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-24 · Lee/Gillmor/Nashville · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Vacek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-04-17 · Lee/Gillmor/Nashville · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nikki Turitto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-10 · Lee/Gillmor/Nashville · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Stiller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-04-07 · Hopson/Jett/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Gillmor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-31 · Hopson/Jett/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Hopson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
Teams16 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 65.4% of games
3.5
72.2%
13W–5L · 60.1% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
18%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King