← Search

Jessica Bremer

Bedford, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
223 matches · 146W–77L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jessica Bremer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history223 matches
W
2026-02-06 · Saw Mill Club · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Lerner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-4
W
2025-11-24 · Chestnut Ridge · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Agdern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6
L
2025-11-22 · Chestnut Ridge: Unmatchables · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claire Gilvar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-4
W
2025-11-20 · Chestnut Ridge · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Scavo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Yuki Makioka / Jane Kim
2025-11-15 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with BENJAMIN MILLER mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Lau mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-10 · SMC: The Pink Ladies · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Lerner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-3
W
2025-11-08 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jesse Brundige mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-11-02 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Greenfeld mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
Alexis Capezza / Alexandre Gagnon
2025-10-25 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with BENJAMIN MILLER mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-10-14 · SMC: The Pink Ladies · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Lerner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-10-12 · Chestnut Ridge: Unmatchables · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Dumke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
75%
54W–18L · 60.7% of games
3.5
62.7%
42W–25L · 50.6% of games
4.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 48.9% of games
6.0mixed
75%
12W–4L · 62.4% of games
7.0mixed
50%
11W–11L · 51.9% of games
8.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 41.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
76 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
61 matches
#1 Singles
6%
14 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams