← Search

Joseph Bahorich

New Market, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
354 matches · 196W–158L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Joseph Bahorich to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history354 matches
W
2026-09-08 · HillBent 7.5 Fun · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Patrick Crowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-08-31 · HillBent 7.5 Fun · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jaipaul Agonus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Juan Jose Tijero / James Smith
2026-08-29 · HillBent 7.5 Fun · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jaipaul Agonus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-26 · munshell - IHT 7.5 ComboMix · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Li mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-22 · HillBent 7.5 Fun · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jaipaul Agonus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-08-02 · munshell - IHT 7.5 ComboMix · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Corinna Dragulescu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-27 · Ghim - Wild Cards-40+ · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Florin Iancu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-26 · Ghim - Wild Cards-40+ · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donggeun Sinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-20 · Ghim - Wild Cards-40+ · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tony Adson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-29 · Ghim - Wild Cards-40+ · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Mellendick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-16 · Ghim - Wild Cards-40+ · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wing Chau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-08 · Ghim - Wild Cards · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sung Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams72 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
0.0
60.6%
20W–13L · 53.1% of games
3.5
85.4%
41W–7L · 64.5% of games
4.0
50.5%
48W–47L · 49.7% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
50%
12W–12L · 48.1% of games
8.5
40%
2W–3L · 43.7% of games
0.0mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 51.3% of games
3.5mixed
70%
7W–3L · 59.6% of games
4.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 40.8% of games
7.0mixed
69.6%
16W–7L · 62.3% of games
7.5mixed
52.6%
10W–9L · 51.5% of games
8.0mixed
39.6%
21W–32L · 48.3% of games
8.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
125 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
122 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
105 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova