← Search

James Forbes

Laurel, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
212 matches · 136W–76L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add James Forbes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history212 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Zhang - Game of Serves · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelsey Forbes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-1
W
2026-08-26 · Zhang - Game of Serves · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelsey Forbes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · Harper · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Burnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5
L
2026-07-24 · Putman - CourtDogs 40+ · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suresh Ram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-22 · Harper · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Amos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-19 · Martin · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Simone Saunches mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · Harper · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frank Burnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-14 · Putman - CourtDogs 40+ · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-13 · Dauses - BC/MC · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ken Flower
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · Putman - CourtDogs 40+ · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ilya Dondoshansky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-07 · McKeon - Defenders · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Halfpap
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-05 · Martin · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bari Abensohn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams94 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
73.3%
33W–12L · 59.3% of games
4.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 48.3% of games
7.0
66.7%
22W–11L · 58.3% of games
7.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 54.8% of games
8.0
40%
2W–3L · 52.7% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 66.3% of games
7.0mixed
64.4%
38W–21L · 58.7% of games
7.5mixed
44.4%
8W–10L · 49.4% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
86 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
83 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
43 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams