← Search

Kelsey Forbes

Laurel, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
290 matches · 162W–128L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Kelsey Forbes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history290 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Baby Got Backhand · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cintya Leveque
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-08 · Spicer - Feelin' Single · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-5
W
2026-09-08 · Zhang - Game of Serves · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with James Forbes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-1
W
2026-08-26 · Zhang - Game of Serves · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with James Forbes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · Baldwin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Mulholland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-08-09 · Baldwin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Rohm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Maureen Fox / Kim Miller
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Skeeta Narciss championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-07 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-07 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-08-04 · Baby Got Backhand · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Savannah Bergen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-29 · Spicer - Feelin' Single · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-3
L
2026-07-27 · Baby Got Backhand · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Savannah Bergen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams83 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 56.6% of games
3.5
76.9%
20W–6L · 57.7% of games
4.0
47.1%
41W–46L · 49.9% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
5.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
70%
7W–3L · 63.1% of games
7.5
52.4%
11W–10L · 51.1% of games
8.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 47% of games
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 63.5% of games
6.5mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 68.5% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
20W–8L · 57.7% of games
7.5mixed
63.6%
14W–8L · 54.5% of games
8.0mixed
41.7%
10W–14L · 45.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 23% of the time
#1 Doubles
23%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
58 matches
#2 Singles
19%
56 matches
#1 Singles
17%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
46 matches
#3 Singles
4%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova