← Search

Emily Uhland

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
158 matches · 87W–71L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Emily Uhland to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history158 matches
L
2026-09-04 · Su.Knowles40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lynne Manweiler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-31 · El.Copeland40C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Danielle Wilder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-27 · Su.Knowles40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maggie Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-08-25 · An.Kinlaw18C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Molly Briggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-18 · An.Kinlaw18C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Molly Briggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-13 · Al.Kalinoski40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Megan Black
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-08-12 · #1 Doubles · with Sara Mazurak championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
Camille Conzola / Heather Roberts
2026-08-10 · #1 Doubles · with Sara Mazurak championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Mike Uhland championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-07 · Ka.Hagens40M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Uhland mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-07-17 · Ly.Manweiler18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Dwyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-17 · Ka.Hagens40M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Uhland mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
46.2%
24W–28L · 54.2% of games
4.0
42.9%
9W–12L · 46.9% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
50%
10W–10L · 53.2% of games
7.5
59.3%
16W–11L · 54.5% of games
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
75%
15W–5L · 64.2% of games
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 62.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
32 matches
#1 Singles
12%
19 matches
#2 Singles
5%
8 matches
#3 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer