← Search

Camille Conzola

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
437 matches · 258W–179L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Camille Conzola to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history437 matches
L
2026-09-13 · TOC.Conzola · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christin Daniels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-28 · Ke.Townsend40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Yuwie Hager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-26 · Ch.Burr40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hope Graney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-24 · Ca.Conzola55C7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marina Barthalmus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-08-21 · Ke.Townsend40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gillian Sellick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-17 · Ca.Conzola55C7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura Davidson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-16 · TOC.Conzola · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Theresa Stone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 0-1
W
Karen Gupton / Tina Jones
2026-08-13 · Ca.Conzola55C6.5 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jan Copeland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-10 · #1 Doubles · with Heather Roberts championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-09 · TOC.Conzola · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sandra Chapman-Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-07 · Ca.Conzola40M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vincent Conzola mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-06 · Ch.Burr18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ngoc Tran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams90 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
83.9%
26W–5L · 64% of games
3.5
58.3%
116W–83L · 51.8% of games
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 50% of games
5.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 52.3% of games
6.5
68.1%
49W–23L · 55.3% of games
7.5
43.9%
18W–23L · 49.4% of games
3.5mixed
61.9%
13W–8L · 53.9% of games
7.0mixed
37%
10W–17L · 50.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
169 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
161 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
102 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert