← Search

Megan Everett

— year-end
50 matches · 23W–27L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Megan Everett to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
L
2026-09-12 · Williams/Spalding/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kerry Lynn Regan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-23 · Williams/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sarah Gedney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
Elizabeth Davis / Erin Neal
2026-08-15 · Williams/Spalding/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristina Kamer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-09 · Williams/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lacey Keally
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-25 · Spalding/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Siprachanh Chanthaphaychith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-18 · Spalding/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Coffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-26 · Spalding/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joni Covington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-21 · Spalding/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-15 · Spalding/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tinsley Hastings
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-25 · Spalding/Nashville · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-11 · Spalding/Nashville · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2023-08-05 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Paul Baker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
Teams9 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
83.3%
10W–2L · 63.2% of games
4.0
48%
12W–13L · 47.7% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 31.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
15 matches
#1 Singles
16%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
6 matches
#2 Singles
10%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams