← Search

Nathan Pritchard

— year-end
84 matches · 42W–42L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nathan Pritchard to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
L
2026-06-30 · CCW SCOTT · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bruce Bugno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-09 · CCW SCOTT · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Troy Kittelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-26 · CCW MCCLELLAND · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Tostanoski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-12 · CCW MCCLELLAND · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Tostanoski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-28 · CCW MCCLELLAND · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rande Short
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-21 · CCW MCCLELLAND · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Troy Kittelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-14 · CCW MCCLELLAND · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-08-19 · CCW SCOTT · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Tostanoski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-08-05 · CCW SCOTT · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Harsha Nagaraj
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2025-07-29 · CCW SCOTT · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Harsha Nagaraj
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-07-08 · CCW MCCLELLAND · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Troy Kittelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-07-01 · CCW MCCLELLAND · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Troy Kittelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Teams23 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
60.5%
23W–15L · 56.5% of games
3.5
38.2%
13W–21L · 43.6% of games
6.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 48.6% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 39.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
18 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches
#2 Singles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams