← Search

Jason Hickerson

Colorado Springs, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 58W–28L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jason Hickerson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
W
Gregory Smith / David Evans
2026-08-25 · FLYHS HICKERSON · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Swenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-23 · FLYHS SAXBY · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gina Scheper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-18 · FLYHS HICKERSON · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-08-09 · FLYHS SAXBY · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tisha Hickerson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · FLYHS HICKERSON · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · FLYHS SAXBY · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Saxby mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-28 · FLYHS HICKERSON · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Bryant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-26 · FLYHS SAXBY · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristi Creps mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Kaleigh Doke championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · with Kaleigh Doke championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · with Tisha Hickerson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-21 · FLYHS HICKERSON · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 62.6% of games
3.5
63.6%
21W–12L · 57.1% of games
6.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 68.9% of games
6.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 71.6% of games
7.0mixed
52.6%
10W–9L · 53.2% of games
7.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 59% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
20 matches
#1 Singles
22%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
11 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert