← Search

Ronald Miller

— year-end
52 matches · 14W–38L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Ronald Miller to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history52 matches
W
2026-04-19 · IA/Carlyle-Miller/65&Over8.0M · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with William (Ev) Cochrane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-03 · Carlyle/Miller · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alejandro Andreotti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-22 · Carlyle/Miller · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chuck Winkleblack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-10 · Blume: Genesis · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Vitaly Pecharsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-12-13 · Blume: Genesis · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brent Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-09 · Carlyle/Miller · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dale Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-10-26 · Carlyle/Miller · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Nordhoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2025-10-11 · Chuck Mahoski/Iowa · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles Mahoski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-11 · Chuck Mahoski/Iowa · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph McAdams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2025-10-10 · Chuck Mahoski/Iowa · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles Mahoski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-10-10 · Chuck Mahoski/Iowa · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph McAdams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-28 · Carlyle/Miller · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Nordhoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
Teams38 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5
0%
0W–7L · 18.4% of games
8.0
22.2%
8W–28L · 42.8% of games
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert