← Search

Christine Bush

Burlington, IA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 24W–21L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Christine Bush to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
L
2026-04-25 · Betts & Hooley: HTRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tricia Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-12 · Cram · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Liz McPearce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-02-14 · Betts & Hooley: HTRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tricia Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-02-07 · Betts & Hooley: HTRC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ana Lira
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-18 · Cram · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Liz McPearce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-18 · Cram · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Liz McPearce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-01-11 · Cram · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Liz McPearce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2025-12-20 · Cram: HTRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tricia Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2025-10-26 · Cram · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Liz McPearce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-04-19 · Amelon & Anderson: HTRC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Novak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-03-02 · Cram · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marcia Carman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-12-08 · Cram · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rika Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
56.2%
18W–14L · 53.3% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
50%
6W–6L · 54.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal