← Search

Dawn Ver Steeg

Ankeny, IA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
101 matches · 73W–28L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Dawn Ver Steeg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history101 matches
W
2026-07-02 · Goode & Bradfield: Genesis · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-30 · IA/Pham-Shipp/18&Over4.0W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Bitner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-17 · Shippfield · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lori Marchese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-16 · IA/Pham-Shipp/18&Over4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Calla Whipp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-03 · Heil/Hanson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brandon Willett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · Shippfield · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Bradfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-25 · IA/Pham-Shipp/18&Over4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Willow Bauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-12 · Shippfield · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lori Marchese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-10 · IA/Pham-Shipp/18&Over4.0W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Bitner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-03-29 · Heil/Hanson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Heil mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-28 · IA/Pham-Shipp/18&Over4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Willow Bauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-06 · IA/Pham-Shipp/18&Over4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Willow Bauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 59.3% of games
4.0
66.7%
22W–11L · 56% of games
8.0
85.7%
30W–5L · 61.6% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
62.5%
15W–9L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
19 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King