← Search

Kim Sherman

— year-end
95 matches · 53W–42L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Kim Sherman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history95 matches
L
2026-07-14 · Rath · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Siddall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
Ann Brown / Ann Knierim
2026-06-09 · Rath · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tiffany Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-25 · Brown: Elmcrest · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brooke Zrudsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · Hurn/Sherman · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Faye Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-03-08 · Hurn/Sherman · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Faye Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-07 · Brown: Elmcrest · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-01 · Ross · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Stern mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-01-31 · Brown: Elmcrest · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brooke Zrudsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-01-25 · Ross · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Stern mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-11 · Hurn/Sherman · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cathy Dmello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-10 · Brown: Elmcrest · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Skogman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-03 · Brown: Elmcrest · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amara Andrews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Teams40 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 49.3% of games
4.0
61.1%
22W–14L · 56.7% of games
8.0
53.6%
15W–13L · 48.7% of games
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 49.6% of games
8.0mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 58.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
22 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova