← Search

Chelsey Vascura

Columbus, OH
4.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
89 matches · 74W–15L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Chelsey Vascura to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history89 matches
W
2022-11-13 · Olympic · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jana Hrdinova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2022-10-30 · Olympic · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jana Hrdinova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2022-10-23 · Olympic · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jana Hrdinova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2022-10-09 · Olympic · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jana Hrdinova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2022-07-14 · Olympic-Carter · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Julie Smith Henson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2022-06-02 · Olympic-Carter · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tess Tannehill
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2022-05-01 · Olympic · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Smith Henson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2022-04-10 · Olympic · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jana Hrdinova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2022-04-03 · Olympic · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jana Hrdinova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2022-03-20 · Olympic · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katherine Eisnaugle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2022-02-27 · Olympic · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jana Hrdinova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2022-01-09 · Olympic · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lindsay Fisher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
81.2%
39W–9L · 63.5% of games
4.5
91.3%
21W–2L · 66.8% of games
7.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 63.3% of games
8.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 56.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 60% of the time
#1 Doubles
60%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
14 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert