← Search

Tess Tannehill

— year-end
103 matches · 64W–39L · seasons 2020–2025

Captains: add Tess Tannehill to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history103 matches
L
2025-04-06 · Olympic · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lydia Peercy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-0
W
2025-03-30 · Olympic · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Smith Henson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-1
W
2025-03-09 · Olympic · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lindsay Fisher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2025-02-16 · Olympic · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lydia Peercy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-02-02 · Olympic · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Deb Lawrence
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-6
L
2025-01-19 · Olympic · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-01-12 · Olympic · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelsey Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
Cassie Lucks / Melanie Campbell
2025-01-05 · Olympic · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Linder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2024-12-15 · Olympic · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lydia Peercy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2024-11-24 · Olympic · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Linder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2024-11-17 · Olympic · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelsey Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2024-11-10 · Olympic · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
Teams26 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
67.1%
47W–23L · 54.5% of games
4.5
21.4%
3W–11L · 44.6% of games
8.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 57.6% of games
8.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
16 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert