← Search

Nishant de Quadros

— year-end
104 matches · 55W–49L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Nishant de Quadros to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history104 matches
L
2026-09-01 · Steed-CC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-29 · Steed-CC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-25 · Hinkle · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with William Hinkle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
Matthew Hall / Paul Hart
2026-08-20 · Hinkle · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Doug Conroy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-16 · Chavez-CC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christopher Chavez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-15 · Desai-CC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Oscar Vasquez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
Joshua Reynolds / David Mann
2026-08-02 · Chavez-CC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Patrick Howard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-26 · Chavez-CC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christopher Chavez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-28 · deQuadros-GI · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Prichard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-17 · Dodsworth-GI · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Elizabeth Cawthorne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · deQuadros-GI · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paige Penner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-09 · deQuadros-GI · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandi Vaughn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Teams85 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
40%
4W–6L · 46.8% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
59.5%
47W–32L · 52.5% of games
4.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 36.8% of games
7.5
40%
2W–3L · 51.5% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
24 matches
#1 Singles
11%
11 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams