← Search

Stephane Aknin

LONG ISLAND CITY, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
122 matches · 74W–48L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Stephane Aknin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history122 matches
L
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Eric Laderman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Raymond Borno championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-09 · Metro: Rader/Bhagwagar · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Stephan Mignot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · Metro: Rader/Bhagwagar · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Raymond Borno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-4
W
2026-06-17 · Metro: Rader/Bhagwagar · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Scott Rader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-15 · Rader/Bhagwagar · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Rader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-02 · #3 Doubles · with Rajat Bhatia championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-28 · Rader/Bhagwagar · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rajat Bhatia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-04-26 · Rader/Bhagwagar · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rajat Bhatia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-16 · #3 Doubles · with Rajat Bhatia championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
Nathan Clark / Peter Taub
2026-04-08 · Rader/Lee · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Laurelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-30 · Rader/Lee · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rajat Bhatia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
80%
8W–2L · 60.4% of games
4.0
74.6%
53W–18L · 56.5% of games
4.5
12.5%
2W–14L · 36.4% of games
8.0
0%
0W–4L · 33.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
27 matches
#2 Singles
16%
19 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert