← Search

Horatio Wildman

New York, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
193 matches · 97W–96L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Horatio Wildman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history193 matches
L
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Eric Laderman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Eric Laderman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · with Eric Laderman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Eric Laderman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
Spencer Koh / Edward Park
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Eric Laderman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-07-15 · EAC, Subject/Dulberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Mead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-08 · #1 Doubles · with Jatin Rajput championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-28 · Metro: Rader/Bhagwagar · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Laderman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-26 · Romano · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brendan Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-17 · Metro: Rader/Bhagwagar · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Raymond Borno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-16 · EAC, Subject/Dulberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patrick Samedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-02 · Romano · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Adam Jaskowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
44.4%
8W–10L · 53.8% of games
3.5
20%
1W–4L · 40.7% of games
4.0
64.3%
54W–30L · 55% of games
4.5
27%
10W–27L · 41.9% of games
8.0mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 51.1% of games
9.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 50.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
95 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
33 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert