← Search

Kari Barsness

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
250 matches · 125W–125L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Kari Barsness to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history250 matches
L
2026-08-19 · Th.Critcher40C5.5 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Dina Berling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-09 · Ka.Barsness40T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Munster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-20 · Li.Kempf18T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Kempf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-13 · Li.Kempf18T · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Griffin Lamb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-13 · Lo.Elliott18M · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cam Barker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-09 · Ki.Meeker18S · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-07 · Li.Kempf18T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Griffin Lamb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
Caroline Smith
2026-07-02 · Ki.Meeker18S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-2
W
2026-06-26 · Ka.Barsness40T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Munster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
Patricia Moore / Amy Brittain
2026-06-21 · #4 Doubles · with Catherine Bray championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
Jacqueline Morgan
2026-06-20 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-19 · Ka.Barsness40T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Smythe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams70 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
60.9%
78W–50L · 55.6% of games
3.5
26.9%
18W–49L · 37.6% of games
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 51.3% of games
6.5
60%
15W–10L · 51.5% of games
3.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 55.7% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 24% of the time
#3 Doubles
24%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
48 matches
#1 Singles
17%
42 matches
#2 Singles
14%
35 matches
#3 Singles
5%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer