← Search

Marina Barthalmus

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
431 matches · 218W–213L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Marina Barthalmus to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history431 matches
L
2026-08-28 · Ca.Brawner40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lori Mayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-27 · Ca.Schuch40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rossi Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-24 · Ca.Conzola55C7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Camille Conzola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-08-23 · TOC.Shukla · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sabrina Kane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-18 · Ki.Manning55C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Silverberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-18 · Sh.Agresta18C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Theresa Stone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-16 · TOC.Shukla · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Smita Shukla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-14 · Ca.Brawner40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-13 · Ca.Schuch40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ana Maria Allessi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-05 · TOC.Meeker · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paige Alford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-30 · Ca.Conzola55T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Munster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-14 · Jo.Nance55M3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joel Nance mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams108 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
60%
27W–18L · 55.8% of games
3.5
50.2%
106W–105L · 52% of games
4.0
23.1%
3W–10L · 35.9% of games
5.5
50%
3W–3L · 52.3% of games
6.5
54.4%
49W–41L · 53.1% of games
7.5
48.3%
14W–15L · 48.9% of games
3.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 51.7% of games
7.0mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 50.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
168 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
127 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
113 matches
#1 Singles
3%
14 matches
#2 Singles
2%
7 matches
#3 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal