← Search

Jennifer Yamamoto

Pleasant Hill, OR
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
268 matches · 139W–129L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Yamamoto to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history268 matches
L
2026-06-13 · ESTC-Nulty · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shelly Begines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-06 · ESTC-Nulty · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Krissi Martes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-31 · ESTC-Nulty · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cathleen Karcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-10 · ESTC-Nulty · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lela Fossett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-05-03 · ESTC-Mohler · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jody Rolnick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · ESTC-Mohler · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Wiggins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-11-06 · Frogettes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brenda Weckerly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
Leigh Karsch / Meghann Reddy
2024-10-09 · Frogettes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brenda Weckerly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
Jenna Vaccaro / Nan Barash
2024-10-02 · Frogettes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelley Olsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2024-09-25 · Frogettes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brenda Weckerly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2024-03-30 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jon Yamamoto mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2024-03-23 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Chamberlain mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
77.3%
17W–5L · 58.3% of games
3.5
53.3%
24W–21L · 50.9% of games
4.0
49%
47W–49L · 48.2% of games
4.5
23.1%
3W–10L · 35% of games
0.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 52.2% of games
7.0mixed
65.2%
15W–8L · 53.9% of games
8.0mixed
51.5%
17W–16L · 50.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
90 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
80 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
71 matches
#1 Singles
5%
12 matches
#2 Singles
2%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert