← Search

Samantha Kanarek

Moorestown, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
305 matches · 228W–77L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Samantha Kanarek to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history305 matches
W
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Nan Barash championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Jia Liu / Jessica Wisser
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Courtney Darling championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-19 · Unite · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amela Shankar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-14 · Grand Slammers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandy Damico
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-12 · Snider · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Darling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-06-11 · Unite · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rhonda Parris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-06 · Unite · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-05 · Snider · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Mangan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-29 · Snider · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Mudditt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-17 · Grand Slammers · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · with Samuel Mays championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-15 · Snider · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Mudditt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
83.3%
10W–2L · 64.2% of games
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
85%
34W–6L · 68.4% of games
4.0
76.7%
125W–38L · 61.3% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
95.7%
22W–1L · 67.8% of games
8.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 49.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 42% of the time
#1 Singles
42%
129 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
44 matches
#2 Singles
7%
22 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams