← Search

Anuja Rajendra

Ann Arbor, MI
3.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
43 matches · 18W–25L · seasons 2019–2023

Captains: add Anuja Rajendra to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history43 matches
L
2023-11-26 · 3LIB-KUSTARZ 5.5W COMBO SEM F1 · #3 Doubles · with Kelly Altinsel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2023-11-03 · 6LIB-BARDEN 3.0W TEAM SINGLES FALL SEM F1 · #2 Singles · 3.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-1
L
2023-10-28 · 6LIB-BARDEN 3.0W TEAM SINGLES FALL SEM F1 · #2 Singles · 3.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
Paul Foley / Jennifer Foley
2023-08-22 · 6LIB-GONZALEZ MIX18&O 60 SEM F1 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Acar Altinsel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2023-08-08 · 6LIB-GONZALEZ MIX18&O 60 SEM F1 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Acar Altinsel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 0-6
W
2023-06-29 · 2LIB-HEMPHILL AD18&O TH 30NW SEM F4 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2023-06-20 · 3LIB-KERR AD40&O 30NW TU SEM F2 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kendra Kerr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2023-06-13 · 3LIB-KERR AD40&O 30NW TU SEM F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Suyun Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2023-06-08 · 2LIB-HEMPHILL AD18&O TH 30NW SEM F4 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2023-06-06 · 3LIB-KERR AD40&O 30NW TU SEM F2 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barbara Hirschl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2023-06-02 · 6LIB-GONZALEZ MIX18&O 60 SEM F1 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Snow mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2023-06-01 · 2LIB-HEMPHILL AD18&O TH 30NW SEM F4 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janet Barden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2024
1LIB-GONZALEZ 6.0 MIXED 40&O SEM F1
2024 zSEM MIX WINTER 40 & OVER · 2024 60 MIXED 40 & OVER SEM F · 40+
2024
3LIB-INOUE Winter Team Singles 3.0 WOMEN SEM F1
2024 zSEM WINTER TEAM SINGLES · 2024 WOMEN 3.0 WINTER SINGLES SEM
2024
2LIB-BARDEN SEM Tri-Level Showdown W 75 65 55 f1
2023 SE MICHIGAN SHOWDOWN - TRI-LEVEL · 2023 D2 WOMEN 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 SEMI SHOWDOWN TRILEVEL
2023
2LIB-HEMPHILL AD18&O TH 30NW SEM F4
2023 SEM ADULT 18 & OVER NIGHT WOMEN · 3.0 WOMEN THUR PM SEM · 18+
2023
3LIB-KERR AD40&O 30NW TU SEM F2
2023 SEM ADULT 40 & OVER NIGHT WOMEN · 3.0 WOMEN TUES PM SEM · 40+
2023
3LIB-KUSTARZ 5.5W COMBO SEM F1
2023 SEM FALL COMBO DOUBLES · WOMEN 55 COMBO SEM
2023
6LIB-BARDEN 3.0W TEAM SINGLES FALL SEM F1
2023 SEM FALL TEAM SINGLES · WOMEN 3.0 SINGLES SEM
2023
6LIB-GONZALEZ MIX18&O 60 SEM F1
2023 SEM MIX SUMMER 18 & OVER · 6.0 SEM SUM MIX 18 & OVER · 18+
2023
1HV-PRESTON D2 WE W tri-level showdown f1
2022 SEM MICHIGAN SHOWDOWN - TRI-LEVEL · 2022 D2 WE W 7.0 6.0 5.0 SEMI SHOWDOWN TRI-LEVEL
2022
1LIB-HAESSLER women tri-level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 SEM
2022 SEM TRI-LEVEL - August · WOMEN TRI LEVEL 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 SEM D2
2022
2LIB-BARDEN 55 W/E WOMEN SEM F1
2022 SEM FALL COMBO DOUBLES · WOMEN 55 COMBO SEM
2022
2LIB-HEMPHILL 30NW 18&O AD THURS SEM F4
2022 SEM ADULT 18 & OVER NIGHT WOMEN · 3.0 WOMEN THUR PM SEM · 18+
2022
2LIB-INOUE 25 COED SINGLES SEM
2022 SEM FALL TEAM SINGLES · CO-ED 2.5 SINGLES SEM
2022
3VTC-outside-BUTLER 30NW 40&O AD TUES SEM F3
2022 SEM ADULT 40 & OVER NIGHT WOMEN · 3.0 WOMEN TUES PM SEM · 40+
2022
4LIB-INOUE 25NW 18&O AD MON SEM F2
2022 SEM ADULT 18 & OVER NIGHT WOMEN · 2.5 WOMEN MON PM SEM · 18+
2022
3AAREC-STEINHAUER 25NW 18&O AD MON SEM F1
2021 SEM ADULT 18 & OVER NIGHT WOMEN · 2.5 WOMEN MON PM SEM · 18+
2021
3VTC-JOHNSTON 25 coed sing sem
2021 aSEM FALL TEAM SINGLES · CO-ED 2.5 SINGLES SEM
2021
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
43.8%
7W–9L · 47% of games
3.0
45.5%
10W–12L · 47.4% of games
6.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 28% of the time
#3 Doubles
28%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
8 matches
#2 Singles
19%
8 matches
#1 Singles
14%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
12%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
7%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova