← Search

Jeanne Cooper

Ann Arbor, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
271 matches · 211W–60L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeanne Cooper to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history271 matches
W
2026-08-17 · BARTON-Geer 6.5 Combo Mix · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Wade Cooper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · #1 Doubles · with Cori Peng championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · with Elizabeth King championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-25 · LIB-Marley 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bikramjeet Singh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · with Elizabeth King championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Julie Ewy championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-10 · LIB-Marley 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bikramjeet Singh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-08 · VTC-Cooper (indoor) 40s 4.0 DW F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leslie Ehrman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-06 · HV-King 40s 3.5 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-25 · RCAA-Lamphear (doubles clay) 40s 4.0 NW F1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-24 · HV-Sober 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-22 · HV-King 40s 3.5 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Ewy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams75 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
100%
10W–0L · 63.8% of games
3.0
86.5%
32W–5L · 68.4% of games
3.5
74.5%
70W–24L · 61.2% of games
4.0
47.6%
10W–11L · 47.8% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 60.3% of games
6.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 61.4% of games
6.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
9W–3L · 61.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
97 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
90 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
53 matches
#1 Singles
5%
13 matches
#2 Singles
3%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King