← Search

Kirsten Roeber

Louisville, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 21W–43L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kirsten Roeber to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
2026-09-03 · MEA YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Streett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-27 · MEA YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emel Gomulka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-20 · MEA YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Streett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-04 · MEA ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Streett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-07-28 · MEA ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annika Paradise
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-23 · MEA YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emel Gomulka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-02 · MEA GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Streett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-06-25 · MEA GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gia Medeiros
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-23 · MEA ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alice Madden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-10 · MEA GREEN · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Cendali
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-5
L
2026-06-04 · MEA GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emel Gomulka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-03 · MEA GREEN · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Jamison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
45%
9W–11L · 48.3% of games
4.0
25%
10W–30L · 40.4% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 47.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
12 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova